Media Releases 2004
News Release : 17 March 2004STATEMENT Initial response to Kate Barker, Review of Housing Supply, March 2004 On housing numbers: We are sceptical that increasing housing supply will significantly reduce house prices; Kate Barker herself has shown that the housing market is far more complicated than that. New house building, even at the levels suggested, will only add one or two percent to the housing stock. Prices are actually determined by household incomes, interest rates and location. The notion that the South East should or could increase house building rates by up to 100% is wholly unrealistic, both economically and environmentally. All our growth projections for the region to 2026 show a much lower demand for new housing than Kate Barker suggests. We have demonstrated to Government that the reasons for the current shortfall in new homes (against a target of 28,000 completions a year) are more to do with the housing industry and a lack of infrastructure than reluctant planning authorities. There are at present outstanding planning permissions for 78,000 homes across the South East that the industry could take up more rapidly if the market dictated. There are also plan allocations for a further 117,000 homes. Tellingly, however, developments totalling 40,000 homes are currently held up by transport infrastructure constraints. On policy and decision making arrangements: It is naïve to imagine that issues of such vital concern to people can be handled as purely technical problems; these are highly political matters on which citizens deserve, through their locally elected representatives, to have their say. We hope the Government will roundly reject proposals that will further emasculate local democracy. Yet more change to the planning system risks disruption and delay to the new regional plan for the South East that the Assembly is preparing now to tackle the challenges of growth. On affordable housing: Government has to bite the bullet to support those unable to participate in the housing market, including key workers and the less well-off. We therefore welcome Kate Barker’s strong advocacy of additional public funding for social housing. On implementation, infrastructure and services: The real focus needs to be on implementation. We are pleased that the report has taken on board our proposals that local authorities should be able to keep the extra council tax raised from new developments to fund the services to which they give rise. We also welcome the report’s recognition of our case that, especially in prosperous regions like ours, some of the increased values conveyed by planning permissions need to be systematically captured to fund the community infrastructure required by new developments. ContactLesley van Dijk, PR Executive - 01483 555223 Alex Butlin, PR Executive - 01483 555221 Notes to editors:
Last updated: 21 August 2007 |



